Snow v. Holmes
This text of 30 P. 806 (Snow v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application fora writ of supersedeas, staying the execution of the judgment pending the appeal, in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage of personal property. The appellant (mortgagor) has executed the usual undertaking on appeal for three hundred dollars.
The judgment in this case was rendered in accordance with section 726 Code of Civil Procedure. The Code prescribes no bond in addition to the three hundred dollar bond in such a case. Section 949 provides that in cases not provided for in the sections therein named, the appeal is perfected by giving the undertaking provided in section 941. Such being the statute, we must be governed by it.
The motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 P. 806, 64 Cal. 232, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-holmes-cal-1883.