Snow v. Holmes

30 P. 806, 64 Cal. 232, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 610
California Supreme Court·Decided October 22, 1883·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application fora writ of supersedeas, staying the execution of the judgment pending the appeal, in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage of personal property. The appellant (mortgagor) has executed the usual undertaking on appeal for three hundred dollars.

The judgment in this case was rendered in accordance with section 726 Code of Civil Procedure. The Code prescribes no bond in addition to the three hundred dollar bond in such a case. Section 949 provides that in cases not provided for in the sections therein named, the appeal is perfected by giving the undertaking provided in section 941. Such being the statute, we must be governed by it.

The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snow v. Holmes, 30 P. 806, 64 Cal. 232, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 610 (Cal. 1883).

30 P. 806 (Snow v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Karry v. Superior Court
122 P. 475 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Commercial, Etc. Bank of S.J. v. Hornberger
66 P. 74 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Barnes v. Buffalo Pitts Co.
57 P. 267 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1899)
Braithwaite v. Jordan
31 L.R.A. 238 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)
McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
33 P. 329 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Powers v. Crane
7 P. 135 (California Supreme Court, 1885)