Snow v. Dick
This text of 2 Ky. Op. 73 (Snow v. Dick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
It seems to this court that the physical restraint and mental disability of the appellee constituted an equitable excuse for his non-precise tender for redemption, and that the appellant ought to have accepted the subsequent tender, and that, when he seeks the aid of a court of equity to obtain a substitute of his lost deed, the court, intsead of granting such harsh and ungracious relief, should have required him, as it did, to surrender his hard and accidental [74]*74advantage, and accept the amount to which he is legally entitled for redemption.
Perceiving no error in the judgment, either in principle or detail, this court therefore affirms it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ky. Op. 73, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-dick-kyctapp-1867.