Snow v. Commissioner

1 T.C.M. 197, 1942 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1942
DocketDocket No. 107390, 107391.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1 T.C.M. 197 (Snow v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snow v. Commissioner, 1 T.C.M. 197, 1942 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48 (tax 1942).

Opinion

George Palen Snow v. Commissioner. Estate of Mary Palen Snow, Deceased, George Palen Snow and Dorothy S. Nicholas, Executors v. Commissioner.
Snow v. Commissioner
Docket No. 107390, 107391.
United States Tax Court
1942 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48; 1 T.C.M. (CCH) 197; T.C.M. (RIA) 42632;
December 10, 1942

*48 Petitioners in 1937 exchanged stock in one corporation solely for stock in another corporation. Held, that the exchange was made in pursuance of a plan of reorganization; that both corporations were parties to the reorganization; and that under section 112 (b)(3) of the Revenue Act of 1936, the gain from the exchange should not be recognized. Anna V. Gilmore, et al., 44 B.T.A. 881, affirmed by both the Third and Fifth Circuit Courts, followed.

John D. Garrison, Esq., 25 Broadway, New York City, for the petitioners. Cor way N. Kitchen, Esq., for the respondent.

BLACK

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

These consolidated proceedings are for the redetermination of deficiencies in income taxes determined by the respondent for the calendar year 1937 against petitioner George Palen Snow in the amount of $9,014.83 and against the Estate of Mary Palen Snow, deceased, in the amount of $2,450.84.

Petitioner George Palen Snow assigned but one error:

(a) The Commissioner erred in including in petitioner's net income the sum of $34,266.30 as recognizable gain realized by petitioner upon the exchange of stock of Anthony Avenue Holding Company, Inc., for stock*49 of Realty Operating Company in 1937.

The executors for the Estate of Mary Palen Snow likewise assigned but one error:

(a) The Commissioner erred in including in the decedent's net income the sum of $14,800.50 as recognizable gain realized by decedent upon the exchange of stock of Anthony Avenue Holding Company, Inc. for stock of Realty Operating Company in 1937.

In the respective deficiency notices the respondent made other adjustments to net income which are not contested by petitioners.

Findings of Fact

Petitioner George Palen Snow is an individual who filed his Federal income tax return for the calendar year 1937 with the collector of internal revenue for the third district of New York.

Petitioners George Palen Snow and Dorothy S. Nicholas are the duly qualified executors of the Estate of Mary Palen Snow, deceased. A Federal income tax return for the calendar year 1937 was filed by George Palen Snow as such executor on behalf of Mary Palen Snow, deceased, with the collector of internal revenue for the third district of New York.

In 1937 Realty Operating Company (sometimes hereinafter referred to as "Realty") and Anthony Avenue Holding Company, Inc. (sometimes hereinafter*50 referred to as "Anthony") were stock corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York and each corporation was authorized to engage in the business of holding real estate, mortgage participations and other investments. The powers of these two corporations were not enlarged at any time material to these proceedings.

During 1937 Realty had issued and outstanding 2,250 shares of common stock of $50 par value per share, all of which, except for two qualifying shares held by directors, was owned by petitioner George Palen Snow. Prior to June 21, 1937, Realty had issued and outstanding in addition to its common stock, 2,000 shares of voting preferred stock of $100 par value per share, all of which was owned by Anthony.

Prior to July 20, 1937, Anthony had issued and outstanding 400 shares of common stock of $100 par value per share which constituted its sole authorized issue. Prior to June, 1937, such shares were owned of record and beneficially as follows:

NameNo. of Shares
George Palen Snow243
Mary Palen Snow105
Dorothy Nicholas52
400

Prior to 1936, Anthony was the owner of two garages which were operated for its account by Realty. *51 Anthony derived a substantial income from such operation. In 1936, Anthony parted with title to the garages and thereafter the only remaining assets of Anthony were the original 2,000 shares of voting preferred stock of Realty and certain marketable securities. These securities had a fair market value on July 20, 1937, of $24,758.40 and were carried on the books of Anthony at a cost of $24,500. The only liability of Anthony July 20, 1937, was a note payable in the amount of $15,300. Realty continued to manage the two garages on a brokerage basis after Anthony had disposed of them.

For some time prior to 1937 and during 1937 and 1938, Realty, in addition to being in the business of real estate management, was engaged in the business of making mortgage loans. In 1937, the management of Realty contemplated continuing and expanding the mortgage loan business. In order to carry on the mortgage loan business Realty was required to have among its assets a substantial amount of cash and marketable securities. Prior to July 20, 1937, the assets of Realty consisted of cash, mortgages and mortgage participations, loans and accounts receivable, notes receivable, stocks and bonds.

On June 17, *52

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilmore v. Commissioner (A)
44 B.T.A. 881 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 T.C.M. 197, 1942 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-commissioner-tax-1942.