Snow v. Chapman
1 Root 528
Opinion
The court were of opinion that the deed granted nothing but the lands lying within the bounds described, and gave judgment for the defendant, that he had kept and performed his covenants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snow v. Chapman, 1 Root 528 (Colo. 1793).
1 Root 528 (Snow v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aherns v. Drew
148 A. 549 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1930)
Docter v. Furch
44 N.W. 826 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Docter v. Hellberg
27 N.W. 176 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1886)
Armstrong v. Brownfield
32 Kan. 116 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1884)
Webb v. Brown
2 Posey 36 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)
King v. Brown
54 Ind. 368 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Ufford v. Wilkins
33 Iowa 110 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1871)
Wright v. Wright
34 Ala. 194 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Higley v. Bidwell
9 Conn. 455 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1833)
Belden v. Seymour
8 Conn. 19 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1830)
Smith v. Evans
6 Binn. 102 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1813)