Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. Public Utility Commission
795 P.2d 611, 102 Or. App. 687, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 860
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 1, 1990·No. A8812-06809, A8907-03971; CA A62055·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Snow Mountain Pine Company appeals from a decision of the circuit court affirming an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) on remand from this court. Snow Mt. Pine Company v. Maudlin, 84 Or App 590, 734 P2d 1366, rev den 303 Or 591 (1987). It contends that PUC’s decision is inconsistent with our remand instructions or, in the alternative, that our opinion and remand instructions were wrong. We adhere to our opinion and conclude that PUC complied with our instructions on remand.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. Public Utility Commission, 795 P.2d 611, 102 Or. App. 687, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 860 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
795 P.2d 611 (Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. Public Utility Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.
7 P.3d 594 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. CP National Corp.
829 P.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)