Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd.

C.D. California

Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd.

DecidedMarch 6, 2023

Docket2:23-cv-00887

StatusUnknown

This text of Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd. (Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd., (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00887-FWS-MAA Document 10 Filed 03/06/23 Page1of1 Page ID#:44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-00887-FWS (MAAx) Date March 6, 2023 Title Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd. et al

Present: The Honorable FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Melissa H. Kunig Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On February 7, 2023, the Clerk of Court filed a Notice to Counsel Re: Copyright, Patent, and Trademark Reporting Requirements, directing Plaintiff to file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (Dkt. 8.) The record reflects counsel has not filed the required forms at this time. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before March 17, 2023, at 12:00 p.m., why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing the forms required by the Central District of California’s Local Rule 3-1. Failure to comply with the court’s order may result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.”); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 693, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (“It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.”).

Initial of Deputy Clerk =mku

CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case 2:23-cv-00887-FWS-MAA Document 10 Filed 03/06/23 Page1of1 Page ID#:44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-00887-FWS (MAAx) Date March 6, 2023 Title Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd. et al

Present: The Honorable FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Melissa H. Kunig Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On February 7, 2023, the Clerk of Court filed a Notice to Counsel Re: Copyright, Patent, and Trademark Reporting Requirements, directing Plaintiff to file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (Dkt. 8.) The record reflects counsel has not filed the required forms at this time. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before March 17, 2023, at 12:00 p.m., why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing the forms required by the Central District of California’s Local Rule 3-1. Failure to comply with the court’s order may result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.”); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 693, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (“It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.”).

Initial of Deputy Clerk =mku

CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Snow Joe, LLC v. Shenzhen Zhaohao Industrial Co., Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-joe-llc-v-shenzhen-zhaohao-industrial-co-ltd-cacd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack