Snow Industries, Inc. v. Borro Mechanical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Snow Industries, Inc. v. Borro Mechanical Corp.

238 A.D.2d 429, 657 N.Y.S.2d 356

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 429 (Snow Industries, Inc. v. Borro Mechanical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snow Industries, Inc. v. Borro Mechanical Corp., 238 A.D.2d 429, 657 N.Y.S.2d 356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works, dated December 8, 1995, which, after a hearing, determined that the petitioner was not a "responsible bidder” and excluded it from obtaining a renovation project, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated February 26, 1996, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The respondents Suffolk County Department of Public Works and the Suffolk County Commissioner of Public Works did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner in denying the petitioner status as a responsible bidder for a contract involv[430]*430ing the renovation of two police precincts in Suffolk County (see, Matter of Grgas Contr. Co. v Mercklowitz, 168 AD2d 678).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works, dated December 8, 1995, which, after a hearing, determined that the petitioner was not a "responsible bidder” and excluded it from obtaining a renovation project, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated February 26, 1996, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The respondents Suffolk County Department of Public Works and the Suffolk County Commissioner of Public Works did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner in denying the petitioner status as a responsible bidder for a contract involv[430]*430ing the renovation of two police precincts in Suffolk County (see, Matter of Grgas Contr. Co. v Mercklowitz, 168 AD2d 678).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 429, 657 N.Y.S.2d 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-industries-inc-v-borro-mechanical-corp-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack