Snooks v. State

132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 257, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 682
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1926
Docket17143
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 779 (Snooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snooks v. State, 132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 257, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal, to grant a new trial was not error. '

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloockoorth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 779, 35 Ga. App. 257, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snooks-v-state-gactapp-1926.