Snook v. Munday

45 A. 1005, 90 Md. 704, 1900 Md. LEXIS 120
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Snook v. Munday. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Md. 514
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

Boyd, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It follows from what we have said in the preceding case between these parties, that the order of the Orphans’ Court of Washington County, passed on the ioth day of November, 1899, must be reversed. But as there was no occasion to have the petition of Elizabeth Munday and the copy of the will of John Munday inserted in the record in this case, as they were in the other record, each party will be required to pay one-half of the costs in this Court, including the costs of the copy transmitted to this Court, the costs below to be paid by the appellee. There was indeed no necessity to have two records.

Order reversed, each party to pay one-half of the costs in this Court, the appellee to pay the costs in the lower Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snook v. Munday, 45 A. 1005, 90 Md. 704, 1900 Md. LEXIS 120 (Md. 1900).

45 A. 1005 (Snook v. Munday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.