Snook v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Snook v. Hall

33 A.D.2d 876, 307 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 876 (Snook v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snook v. Hall, 33 A.D.2d 876, 307 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, custody of children awarded to appellant, and case remitted to Family Court to determine the question of visitation rights in accordance with the following Memorandum: The interests of the children, which are paramount, will be best served by their living with the mother. She has remarried and can better provide for the daily needs of Carol, age 10 and Kristen, age 7. The father keeps house alone and is away at work all day. The mother .is awarded custody with visitation rights to the father to be determined by Family Court. All concur, Del Veechio, J., not participating. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Family Court in custody proceeding.) Present — ■ Goldman, P. J., Del Veechio, Gabrielli, Moule and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, without costs, custody of children awarded to appellant, and case remitted to Family Court to determine the question of visitation rights in accordance with the following Memorandum: The interests of the children, which are paramount, will be best served by their living with the mother. She has remarried and can better provide for the daily needs of Carol, age 10 and Kristen, age 7. The father keeps house alone and is away at work all day. The mother .is awarded custody with visitation rights to the father to be determined by Family Court. All concur, Del Veechio, J., not participating. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Family Court in custody proceeding.) Present — ■ Goldman, P. J., Del Veechio, Gabrielli, Moule and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 876, 307 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snook-v-hall-nyappdiv-1969.