Snodgrass v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Snodgrass v. State

1931 OK CR 403, 2 P.2d 982, 52 Okla. Crim. 44, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 392

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1931

DocketNo. A-8081.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 403 (Snodgrass v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snodgrass v. State, 1931 OK CR 403, 2 P.2d 982, 52 Okla. Crim. 44, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 392 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Seminole county of manslaughter in the first degree ,and his punishment fixed at four years in the state penitentiary.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant was driving an automobile while in an intoxicated condition, and while doing so struck and killed Harry Hannah, a youth about 12 years old. Defendant denied that he was intoxicated; said he had only taken one small *45 sip of whisky, and that the Hannah boy had stopped in the highway to tie his shoe, and that defendant, in meeting another car, was forced to one side, and struck him accidentally and without fault on his part. The evidence of the guilt of.defendant is conclusive, and it appears the jury was lenient in assessing the punishment. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. We have examined the record with care, and perceive no substantial error.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Seminole county of manslaughter in the first degree ,and his punishment fixed at four years in the state penitentiary.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant was driving an automobile while in an intoxicated condition, and while doing so struck and killed Harry Hannah, a youth about 12 years old. Defendant denied that he was intoxicated; said he had only taken one small *45 sip of whisky, and that the Hannah boy had stopped in the highway to tie his shoe, and that defendant, in meeting another car, was forced to one side, and struck him accidentally and without fault on his part. The evidence of the guilt of.defendant is conclusive, and it appears the jury was lenient in assessing the punishment. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. We have examined the record with care, and perceive no substantial error.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 403, 2 P.2d 982, 52 Okla. Crim. 44, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snodgrass-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.