Snoden v. Borough of Watchung
This text of 104 A.2d 841 (Snoden v. Borough of Watchung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the Appellate Division in a workmen’s compensation case in which petitioner’s decedent, her husband, died as the result of cardiac failure.
*377 Three lower tribunals, the Division of Workmen’s Compensation, the Somerset County Court and the Superior Court, Appellate Division, have factually determined that the decedent died as the result of an unusual strain arising out of and in the course of his employment. There was evidence to adequately support those findings and we perceive no sound reason for rejecting them. See R. R. 1:5-3(a).
Judgment affirmed.
Hehek and Bkennan, JJ., concurring in result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Yandekbilt, and Justices Hehek, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, 'Bulling, Jacobs' and Bkennan — 7. ■ ' '''
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 A.2d 841, 15 N.J. 376, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snoden-v-borough-of-watchung-nj-1954.