Snoddy v. Snoddy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Snoddy v. Snoddy

197 A.D.2d 835, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10077

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 835 (Snoddy v. Snoddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snoddy v. Snoddy, 197 A.D.2d 835, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Hester, Jr., J.), entered June 1, 1992, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, to modify a prior custody order.

At a hearing on this matter, the parties agreed to, inter alia, the dismissal with prejudice of respondent’s cause of action relating to modification of a prior custody award. Under the circumstances, Family Court’s order dismissing that cause of action should be affirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Hester, Jr., J.), entered June 1, 1992, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, to modify a prior custody order.

At a hearing on this matter, the parties agreed to, inter alia, the dismissal with prejudice of respondent’s cause of action relating to modification of a prior custody award. Under the circumstances, Family Court’s order dismissing that cause of action should be affirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 835, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snoddy-v-snoddy-nyappdiv-1993.