Snoddy v. NCNB National Bank of Florida

573 So. 2d 951, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1991 WL 2751
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 16, 1991
DocketNo. 89-1891
StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 951 (Snoddy v. NCNB National Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snoddy v. NCNB National Bank of Florida, 573 So. 2d 951, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1991 WL 2751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find that any procedural error committed by the trial court was rendered harmless in view of the absence of any issue between the parties as to any material fact. On the undisputed facts we find the trial court acted correctly in its legal ruling as to the priority of the parties’ claims. See Bank of South Palm Beaches v. Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co., 473 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of South Palm Beaches v. Stockton
473 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 951, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1991 WL 2751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snoddy-v-ncnb-national-bank-of-florida-fladistctapp-1991.