Snoddy v. NCNB National Bank of Florida
575 So. 2d 231, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 1991 WL 7689
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 1991·No. No. 90-0798·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm. The order awarding appellant attorney’s fees did not create a judgment lien as it was not a recordable instrument. §§ 28.29 and 55.10, Fla.Stat. (1989). Recording the nonrecordable order was a nullity. See Malsby v. Gamble, 61 Fla. 327, 54 So. 766 (Fla.1911). Appellant had no legal claim to the receivership funds remaining after the foreclosure sale, and therefore no standing to challenge the trial court’s order which disbursed the funds to appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snoddy v. NCNB National Bank of Florida, 575 So. 2d 231, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 1991 WL 7689 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
575 So. 2d 231 (Snoddy v. NCNB National Bank of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grant v. Louis (In re Coleman)
192 B.R. 268 (M.D. Florida, 1995)
Birdsall v. Crowngap, Ltd.
575 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)