Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board

995 A.2d 334, 606 Pa. 87, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1164
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 26, 2010·No. 297 WAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for purposes of review, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court correctly interpreted 24 Pa.C.S. § 8507(e) to require in this case that a Public School Employees’ Retirement System nomination of benefits form must have been completed entirely in the hand of the member/decedent in order to effectuate a valid change of beneficiary designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board, 995 A.2d 334, 606 Pa. 87, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1164 (Pa. 2010).

995 A.2d 334 (Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board
69 A.3d 170 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)