Snively v. Luce
1 Watts 69
Opinion
An unexecuted parol partition is void; and it is still parol when made by the intervention of agents, pursuant to a parol authority, though their act be evinced by a writing under seal. That can give it no additional authority; and the whole being irrelevant, and void, ought not to have gone to the jury.
Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snively v. Luce, 1 Watts 69 (Pa. 1832).
1 Watts 69 (Snively v. Luce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bass Development of New York, Inc. v. Baisch
20 Misc. 3d 522 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Shepard v. Rinks
78 Ill. 188 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)
Wood v. . Fleet
36 N.Y. 499 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Altemose v. Hufsmith
45 Pa. 121 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1863)