Snively v. Luce
1 Watts 69
This text of 1 Watts 69 (Snively v. Luce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Snively v. Luce, 1 Watts 69 (Pa. 1832).
Opinion
An unexecuted parol partition is void; and it is still parol when made by the intervention of agents, pursuant to a parol authority, though their act be evinced by a writing under seal. That can give it no additional authority; and the whole being irrelevant, and void, ought not to have gone to the jury.
Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bass Development of New York, Inc. v. Baisch
20 Misc. 3d 522 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Shepard v. Rinks
78 Ill. 188 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)
Wood v. . Fleet
36 N.Y. 499 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Altemose v. Hufsmith
45 Pa. 121 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1863)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Watts 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snively-v-luce-pa-1832.