Snitcovsky v. Sangerman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Snitcovsky v. Sangerman

259 So. 3d 311

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 2018

DocketNo. 3D17-2762

StatusPublished

This text of 259 So. 3d 311 (Snitcovsky v. Sangerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snitcovsky v. Sangerman, 259 So. 3d 311 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding there was no issue of material fact regarding Appellant's defenses, we affirm the summary judgment under review. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) ("In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.") (citations and quotations omitted); Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank, 143 So.3d 489, 490 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (Borrower's affidavit of non-receipt of default notice did not create genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment where note required only that notice be mailed and undisputed affidavit established notice was mailed); Parra de Rey v. Rey, 114 So.3d 371, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (upholding summary judgment where party failed to establish material issue of fact regarding defense of duress).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding there was no issue of material fact regarding Appellant's defenses, we affirm the summary judgment under review. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) ("In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.") (citations and quotations omitted); Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank, 143 So.3d 489, 490 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (Borrower's affidavit of non-receipt of default notice did not create genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment where note required only that notice be mailed and undisputed affidavit established notice was mailed); Parra de Rey v. Rey, 114 So.3d 371, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (upholding summary judgment where party failed to establish material issue of fact regarding defense of duress).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 3d 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snitcovsky-v-sangerman-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack