Snipsic Co. v. Riverside Music Co.

California Court of Appeal

Snipsic Co. v. Riverside Music Co.

91 P. 747, 6 Cal. App. 115, 1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 175

California Court of Appeal·Decided July 24, 1907·No. Civ. No. 401.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHAW, J.

This is a motion on the part of the respondent to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Riverside county.

The transcript of the record contains no certificate either by the clerk or attorneys of the correctness of the same, nor does it contain any certificate of the clerk or attorneys that an undertaking on appeal in due form has been properly filed, or waiver thereof. (Code Civ. Proc., see. 953; rule XI, supreme court, 144 Cal. xlv, [78 Pac. vii].)

Appellant has presented an affidavit averring “the said tran script as the same is now of record is in all respects true and correct,” but the affidavit of appellant cannot be substituted for the certificate required by said section 953, Code of Civil Procedure, and the rules of this court, in the absence of which the judgment appealed from cannot be reviewed. (Ellis v. Bennet (Cal.), 3 Pac. 801; Pacific M. Life Ins. Co. v. Edgar, 132 Cal. 197, [64 Pac. 260].)

The motion is granted and appeal dismissed, without prejudice to another appeal.

Allen, P. J., and Taggart, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHAW, J.

This is a motion on the part of the respondent to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Riverside county.

The transcript of the record contains no certificate either by the clerk or attorneys of the correctness of the same, nor does it contain any certificate of the clerk or attorneys that an undertaking on appeal in due form has been properly filed, or waiver thereof. (Code Civ. Proc., see. 953; rule XI, supreme court, 144 Cal. xlv, [78 Pac. vii].)

Appellant has presented an affidavit averring “the said tran script as the same is now of record is in all respects true and correct,” but the affidavit of appellant cannot be substituted for the certificate required by said section 953, Code of Civil Procedure, and the rules of this court, in the absence of which the judgment appealed from cannot be reviewed. (Ellis v. Bennet (Cal.), 3 Pac. 801; Pacific M. Life Ins. Co. v. Edgar, 132 Cal. 197, [64 Pac. 260].)

The motion is granted and appeal dismissed, without prejudice to another appeal.

Allen, P. J., and Taggart, J., concurred.

Snipsic Co. v. Riverside Music Co., 91 P. 747, 6 Cal. App. 115, 1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 175 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

91 P. 747 (Snipsic Co. v. Riverside Music Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related