Snipes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Snipes v. State

473 So. 2d 773, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1880, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17489

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1975

StatusPublished

This text of 473 So. 2d 773 (Snipes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snipes v. State, 473 So. 2d 773, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1880, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Blondell Snipes appeals from an order of the trial court determining the dependency of her minor son. We reverse upon a. finding that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the dependency petition. Williams v. State, 437 So.2d 133 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1690, 80 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Huggins v. State, 453 So.2d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1984); Rodriguez v. State, 436 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 888 (Fla.1984). Furthermore, the trial court erred in discharging appellant’s court appointed attorney because it disagreed with his scheduling of certain depositions.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Blondell Snipes appeals from an order of the trial court determining the dependency of her minor son. We reverse upon a. finding that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the dependency petition. Williams v. State, 437 So.2d 133 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1690, 80 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Huggins v. State, 453 So.2d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1984); Rodriguez v. State, 436 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 888 (Fla.1984). Furthermore, the trial court erred in discharging appellant’s court appointed attorney because it disagreed with his scheduling of certain depositions.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 So. 2d 773, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1880, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snipes-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack