Snipes v. Remoussin
This text of 4 S.C.L. 33 (Snipes v. Remoussin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court being diyided, the decision was postponed until 7th January, 1806, when the opinion of Grimke, Bat, and Brevard, the only judges who heard the argument, was given against the motion. The substance of the opinion was, that although verdicts contrary to evidence, or where there is no evidence to support them, have been set aside and new trials granted, yet where there is a contrariety of evidence on both sides, the court will not grant a new trial, even if they should think the weight of evdence against the verdict, unless it should appear to be greatly and manifestly so; and that the credibility of witnesses is a matter almost exclusively within the province of the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.C.L. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snipes-v-remoussin-sc-1806.