Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Snider v. Podgornoff

Snider v. Podgornoff

552 P.2d 558, 26 Or. App. 309, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1703
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 2, 1976
DocketNo. 21931, CA 5901
StatusPublished

This text of 552 P.2d 558 (Snider v. Podgornoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snider v. Podgornoff, 552 P.2d 558, 26 Or. App. 309, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1703 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order reducing child support. A party who requests such a modification must allege and prove a change in circumstances of one or the other of the parties sufficient to justify the modification. Watson v. Watson, 251 Or 65, 66-67, 444 P2d 476 (1968); Hurner v. Hurner, 179 Or 349, 357, 170 P2d 720 (1946); Frothingham and Frothingham, [310]*31022 Or App 39, 537 P2d 1174 (1975). Here, no evidence was introduced concerning change of circumstances.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Watson
444 P.2d 476 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1968)
Hurner v. Hurner
170 P.2d 720 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1946)
In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Frothingham
537 P.2d 1174 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 P.2d 558, 26 Or. App. 309, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snider-v-podgornoff-orctapp-1976.