Snider v. Aaron Ford

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA HADLEY ANGELIC SNIDER, Case No.: 2:23-cv-02013-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 7] AARON FORD, 7 Defendant 8 On April 16, 2024, Magistrate Judge Couvillier recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Hadley Snider did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF 7. Snider did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report 11}/ and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 14|| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 15}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 7) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 6th day of May, 2024. 20 Z = — 71 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE