Snethern v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snethern v. State

537 S.W.2d 250, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2775

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 12, 1976

DocketNo. 10177

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 537 S.W.2d 250 (Snethern v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snethern v. State, 537 S.W.2d 250, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2775 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Movant-appellant appeals from the dismissal of his pro se Rule 27.26 motion. On November 7, 1974, appellant entered pleas of guilty to burglary and stealing charges. The court conducted a lengthy interrogation, accepted the pleas of guilt, and sentenced appellant to a three-year term of confinement.

The motion consisted of conclusions rather than facts. Further, the transcribed plea proceeding refutes the allegations raised by appellant or shows that they were waived.

The motion was wholly inadequate, did not require an evidentiary hearing, and negated the need for appointed counsel. Bolden v. State, 530 S.W.2d 505, 507[4] (Mo.App.1975).

An opinion would have no precedential value. Affirmed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI