Snelling v. Stephenson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. Stephenson

818 S.W.2d 722, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1629, 1991 WL 219601

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 1991·No. No. 58744·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in slander. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after a court tried case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in slander. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after a court tried case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Snelling v. Stephenson, 818 S.W.2d 722, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1629, 1991 WL 219601 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

818 S.W.2d 722 (Snelling v. Stephenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related