Snelling v. State
This text of 554 So. 2d 673 (Snelling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The departure sentence imposed, based on factors relating to the violation of probation, is vacated on the authority of Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); see also, Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla.1989); Phillips v. State, 550 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); and Branton v. State, 548 So.2d 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). The cause is remanded for resen-tencing within the recommended guidelines range. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987); see also Branton, supra. The trial court may (but need not) bump up one cell. Franklin v. State, supra; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14.
SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 So. 2d 673, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 89, 1990 WL 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.