Snelling v. State

534 So. 2d 902, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5455, 1988 WL 130068
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2080
StatusPublished

This text of 534 So. 2d 902 (Snelling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snelling v. State, 534 So. 2d 902, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5455, 1988 WL 130068 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

We affirm. State v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987). Although a majority of the reasons for departure were erroneous, [903]*903we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed on the basis of Pentaude and the egregious nature of the underlying reasons for appellant’s violation of probation. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albritton v. State
476 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
State v. Pentaude
500 So. 2d 526 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 So. 2d 902, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5455, 1988 WL 130068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.