Snelling v. Snelling

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. Snelling

627 S.W.2d 900, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2725

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 25, 1982

DocketNo. 12249

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 627 S.W.2d 900 (Snelling v. Snelling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snelling v. Snelling, 627 S.W.2d 900, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2725 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

TITUS, Judge.

The husband-father in this dissolution of marriage action instituted by the wife-mother in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, appeals from the decree of dissolution made and entered March 25, 1981. Two boys, Larry Kevin and Kerry Scott respectively 12 and 5 years of age at time of trial, were born of the marriage. By its decree, the court awarded principal care and custody of the older boy to the father and princi[901]*901pal care and custody of the younger boy to the mother. As appellant, the father contends the court nisi erred in not giving him the principal care and custody of both boys.

We find the decree herein, reviewable under Rule 73.01,¹ is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Also, we find that no error of law appears and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

GREENE, P. J., and FLANIGAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TITUS, Judge.

The husband-father in this dissolution of marriage action instituted by the wife-mother in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, appeals from the decree of dissolution made and entered March 25, 1981. Two boys, Larry Kevin and Kerry Scott respectively 12 and 5 years of age at time of trial, were born of the marriage. By its decree, the court awarded principal care and custody of the older boy to the father and princi[901]*901pal care and custody of the younger boy to the mother. As appellant, the father contends the court nisi erred in not giving him the principal care and custody of both boys.

We find the decree herein, reviewable under Rule 73.01,¹ is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Also, we find that no error of law appears and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

GREENE, P. J., and FLANIGAN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

627 S.W.2d 900, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-snelling-moctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack