Snelling v. RIVERFRONT TIMES LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. RIVERFRONT TIMES LLC

318 S.W.3d 139, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 2010 WL 1459478

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 2010

DocketED 93699

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 318 S.W.3d 139 (Snelling v. RIVERFRONT TIMES LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snelling v. RIVERFRONT TIMES LLC, 318 S.W.3d 139, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 2010 WL 1459478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals: (1) the judgment denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s order dismissing some counts of his first amended petition; and (2) the grant of summary judgment as to the remaining counts. Additionally, Snell-ing appeals the court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the grant of summary judgment and the court’s judgment denying Snelling’s motion for leave to file a *140 second amended petition. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s rulings under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. Snelling’s motion to strike Respondent Phillip I. Morse's brief, which has been taken with the case, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals: (1) the judgment denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s order dismissing some counts of his first amended petition; and (2) the grant of summary judgment as to the remaining counts. Additionally, Snell-ing appeals the court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the grant of summary judgment and the court’s judgment denying Snelling’s motion for leave to file a *140 second amended petition. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s rulings under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. Snelling’s motion to strike Respondent Phillip I. Morse's brief, which has been taken with the case, is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

318 S.W.3d 139, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 2010 WL 1459478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-riverfront-times-llc-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack