Snelling v. Michelin North America, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. Michelin North America, Inc.

996 S.W.2d 605, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 594

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 4, 1999

DocketNo. 75160

StatusPublished

This text of 996 S.W.2d 605 (Snelling v. Michelin North America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snelling v. Michelin North America, Inc., 996 S.W.2d 605, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling (“plaintiff’) appeals the judgment dismissing his petition with prejudice as the claims therein were barred under principles of res judicata.

Plaintiffs brief fails to comply with Rule 84.04. Therefore, nothing is preserved for review. See Luft v. Schoenhoff, 935 S.W.2d 685, 687 (Mo.App.1996); Snelling v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 859 S.W.2d 755, 756 (Mo.App.1993).

Respondents’ motions to dismiss are denied. Plaintiffs motion to strike respondents’ briefs is also denied.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI