Snelling v. Masonic Home of Missouri

927 S.W.2d 515, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1160, 1996 WL 362930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Snelling v. Masonic Home of Missouri. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1071
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1996·No. No. 69228·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling, appellant, appeals the denial of his motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Rule 74.06(b)(1). On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion because: 1) the trial court had jurisdiction to rule on the motion; and 2) he was denied his constitutional rights in that his motion was denied without a hearing. Appeal dismissed.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that the trial court did not have jurisdiction over appellant’s motions to set aside judgment pursuant to Rule 74.06(b)(1). We further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snelling v. Masonic Home of Missouri, 927 S.W.2d 515, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1160, 1996 WL 362930 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

927 S.W.2d 515 (Snelling v. Masonic Home of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.