Snelling v. Lewis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. Lewis

449 S.W.3d 420, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2014 WL 4832322

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2014·No. No. ED 101113·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his petition against Etta Williams and Stacy Torrey (Respondents).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in[421] formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his petition against Etta Williams and Stacy Torrey (Respondents).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in[421] formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Snelling v. Lewis, 449 S.W.3d 420, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2014 WL 4832322 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

449 S.W.3d 420 (Snelling v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.