Snelling v. Hemphill
568 S.W.3d 558
This text of 568 S.W.3d 558 (Snelling v. Hemphill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Snelling v. Hemphill, 568 S.W.3d 558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).
Opinion
Lonnie Snelling appeals the denial of his motion to amend or to enter a nunc pro tunc judgment for an order reviving a judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *559reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
568 S.W.3d 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-hemphill-moctapp-2019.