Snelling v. Hemphill

568 S.W.3d 558
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 2019·No. ED 106817·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals the denial of his motion to amend or to enter a nunc pro tunc judgment for an order reviving a judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *559reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snelling v. Hemphill, 568 S.W.3d 558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

568 S.W.3d 558 (Snelling v. Hemphill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.