Snelling v. Hemphill
568 S.W.3d 558
Opinion
Lonnie Snelling appeals the denial of his motion to amend or to enter a nunc pro tunc judgment for an order reviving a judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *559reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snelling v. Hemphill, 568 S.W.3d 558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).
568 S.W.3d 558 (Snelling v. Hemphill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.