Snelling v. Gander
323 S.W.3d 796, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1206, 2010 WL 3540914
Opinion
ORDER
Ursula Gander appeals the judgment of the trial court granting a twenty foot wide easement by prescription of ingress and egress over and across her property. In her sole point on appeal, Mrs. Gander claims that there was not sufficient evidence for the trial court to grant an easement by prescription. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Snelling v. Gander, 323 S.W.3d 796, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1206, 2010 WL 3540914 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
323 S.W.3d 796 (Snelling v. Gander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Maitland
323 S.W.3d 796 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)