Snelling v. CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC.

317 S.W.3d 100, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 609, 2010 WL 1860942

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 2010·No. ED 92831·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals from the orders and judgments entered on June 17, 2008, July 31, 2008, and February 17, 2009, *101 dismissing his claims against K-Mart Corporation, Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., and United Pet Group, Inc., the parent company of Eight In One Pet Products, Inc., respectively. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s rulings under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals from the orders and judgments entered on June 17, 2008, July 31, 2008, and February 17, 2009, *101 dismissing his claims against K-Mart Corporation, Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., and United Pet Group, Inc., the parent company of Eight In One Pet Products, Inc., respectively. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s rulings under Rule 84.16(b).

Snelling v. CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., 317 S.W.3d 100, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 609, 2010 WL 1860942 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

317 S.W.3d 100 (Snelling v. CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.