Snelling v. Beck

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. Beck

320 S.W.3d 209, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2010 WL 3478058

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 2010·No. ED 94394·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals: (1) the grant of summary judgment in favor of Samuel Beck and Cathy Beck; (2) the judgment dismissing Snelling’s case against the minor defendant, Joey Foster; (3) the judgment in favor of Snelling against Cynthia Austin; and (4) the judgment dismissing defendants John Doe and Jane Doe. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals: (1) the grant of summary judgment in favor of Samuel Beck and Cathy Beck; (2) the judgment dismissing Snelling’s case against the minor defendant, Joey Foster; (3) the judgment in favor of Snelling against Cynthia Austin; and (4) the judgment dismissing defendants John Doe and Jane Doe. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Snelling v. Beck, 320 S.W.3d 209, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2010 WL 3478058 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

320 S.W.3d 209 (Snelling v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related