Snelling v. Beck

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. Beck

320 S.W.3d 209, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2010 WL 3478058

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 7, 2010

DocketED 94394

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 320 S.W.3d 209 (Snelling v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snelling v. Beck, 320 S.W.3d 209, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2010 WL 3478058 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals: (1) the grant of summary judgment in favor of Samuel Beck and Cathy Beck; (2) the judgment dismissing Snelling’s case against the minor defendant, Joey Foster; (3) the judgment in favor of Snelling against Cynthia Austin; and (4) the judgment dismissing defendants John Doe and Jane Doe. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals: (1) the grant of summary judgment in favor of Samuel Beck and Cathy Beck; (2) the judgment dismissing Snelling’s case against the minor defendant, Joey Foster; (3) the judgment in favor of Snelling against Cynthia Austin; and (4) the judgment dismissing defendants John Doe and Jane Doe. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

320 S.W.3d 209, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2010 WL 3478058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelling-v-beck-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack