Snellgrove v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Snellgrove v. State

177 So. 353, 28 Ala. App. 27, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 175

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 23, 1937

Docket4 Div. 388.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 177 So. 353 (Snellgrove v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snellgrove v. State, 177 So. 353, 28 Ala. App. 27, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 175 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of illegally having in possession “prohibited liquor.”

The State’s evidence made out every element of the offense charged. There was none opposed. The punishment inflicted was the minimum, under the law.

Without stultifying themselves, the jury could not have returned a verdict of acquittal.

So, misconduct on their part, even if it occurred — -which we do not decide — could not have worked prejudice to appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI