Snell v. State

577 So. 2d 696, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1991 WL 50233
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1095
StatusPublished

This text of 577 So. 2d 696 (Snell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snell v. State, 577 So. 2d 696, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1991 WL 50233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Bryant v. State, 386 So.2d 237 (Fla.1980) (revolver is a “firearm” within meaning of statutes defining firearm); Fischer v. State, 488 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (verdict finding defendant guilty of robbery “as charged” constituted specific finding that defendant was armed during commission of robbery); State v. Nunez, 368 So.2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (word “firearm” within statute defining firearm does not exclude a pistol).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. State
386 So. 2d 237 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Fischer v. State
488 So. 2d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Nunez
368 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
577 So. 2d 696, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1991 WL 50233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snell-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.