Snell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Snell v. State

173 So. 894, 27 Ala. App. 456, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 61

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 20, 1937

Docket4 Div. 308.

StatusPublished

This text of 173 So. 894 (Snell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snell v. State, 173 So. 894, 27 Ala. App. 456, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 61 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The prosecution was begun by affidavit in the county court. The defendant was there convicted and appealed to the circuit court, where he was again convicted, and from this judgment he appeals.

The evidence for the State tended to prove the charge as laid in the complaint. The defendant denied this. But, the evidence being in conflict, the question was properly left to the jury.

We have examined other objections and exceptions and in them we find no reversible error. .

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI