Snell v. Snell

40 Me. 307
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Me. 307 (Snell v. Snell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snell v. Snell, 40 Me. 307 (Me. 1885).

Opinion

Appleton, J.

By the 18th rule of this Court, pleas in abatement must be filed by the second day of the term, at which the actions are entered, and if not so filed, the de[308]*308fendant must be regarded as having waived the particular defect, on account of which, he might by a plea have-abated the writ. Maine Bank v. Hervey, 21 Maine, 38. A motion to dismiss a suit for an alleged insufficiency of service must be made within the time which the rules of Court prescribe for filing pleas in abatement. Pattee v. Low, 35 Maine, 121; Nickerson v. Nickerson, 36 Maine, 417. The motion, in this case, was made at the third term, and was too late.

Exceptions overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munsey v. Groves
117 A.2d 64 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Me. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snell-v-snell-me-1885.