Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.

169 A.3d 232, 325 Conn. 927, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 167

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 17, 2017

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 A.3d 232 (Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc., 169 A.3d 232, 325 Conn. 927, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 167 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 172 Conn.App. 38, 158 A.3d 787 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed on the basis that the doctrine of superseding cause applies in cases in which the conduct of a third party is criminally reckless?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial?"

ROGERS, C.J., and ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 172 Conn.App. 38, 158 A.3d 787 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed on the basis that the doctrine of superseding cause applies in cases in which the conduct of a third party is criminally reckless?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial?"

ROGERS, C.J., and ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.3d 232, 325 Conn. 927, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snell-v-norwalk-yellow-cab-inc-conn-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack