Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills

126 A.D. 921

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that as the cause of action set forth in the complaint was not referable and was denied by the answer and the long account was contained in the counterclaim, the Special Term had no authority to grant the order of reference. (Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 142 N. Y. 236.) All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Williams, J., who dissented on the authority of Irving v. Irving (90 Hun, 423; affd., 149 N. Y. 573.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills, 126 A.D. 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

126 A.D. 921 (Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irving v. . Irving
43 N.E. 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.
37 N.E. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)