Snell v. DELAWARE INSURANCE COMPANY

1 L. Ed. 896, 1 Wash. C. C. 509, 4 U.S. 430, 22 F. Cas. 713, 4 Dall. 430, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 375, 1806 U.S. App. LEXIS 581
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 1, 1806·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

4 U.S. 430 (____)
4 Dall. 430

Snell et al.
versus
The Delaware Insurance Company.

Supreme Court of United States.

*431 Dallas, for the plaintiffs.

Rawle and Condy, for the defendants.

But the COURT were clearly of opinion, that the plaintiffs were entitled to prove and to recover the actual value of the vessel, at the time she was insured. They said a contrary rule, would operate as injuriously to the underwriters, as to the merchant. For, if the merchant could not insure a ship, or goods, bought at a depreciated *432 price, under a forced sale, at their real value; neither would the underwriter, in a case of loss, be entitled to show, upon an open policy, the actual value of the property, independent of a fortuitous enhancement of the price, in a foreign market.

The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs, for 2,378 32/100 dollars, taking, it is presumed, the value in the outward policy, as the basis of their calculation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snell v. DELAWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, 1 L. Ed. 896, 1 Wash. C. C. 509, 4 U.S. 430, 22 F. Cas. 713, 4 Dall. 430, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 375, 1806 U.S. App. LEXIS 581 (U.S. 1806).

1 L. Ed. 896 (Snell v. DELAWARE INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Briggs v. Fenstermaker
E.D. California, 2023
(HC) Forbes v. Eldridge
E.D. California, 2020
United States v. Holcombe
Second Circuit, 2018