Snell v. De Land

Appellate Court of Illinois

Snell v. De Land

32 Ill. App. 68, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 79

DecidedNovember 23, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Ill. App. 68 (Snell v. De Land) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snell v. De Land, 32 Ill. App. 68, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 79 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a bill in chancery filed by appellants against appellee for partition and for an account. The parties owned as tenants in common two farms, and‘the management of one being in appellants and of the other in appellee, a long and somewhat complicated account between the parties had to be adjusted. The cause was referred to a special master, who took the evidence and reported his conclusions to the court; exceptions were filed thereto which, being overruled by the court, a'decree was entered in accordance with the finding of the master, that appellant pay to appellee the sum of $1,320. We have carefully examined the evidence, and the exceptions and reasons urged against the decree of the court, and perceive no error, but think that substantial justice has been reached.

It would serve no good purpose to enter into a detailed statement of the various items entering into the final decree, but we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by the court, and therefore the decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a bill in chancery filed by appellants against appellee for partition and for an account. The parties owned as tenants in common two farms, and‘the management of one being in appellants and of the other in appellee, a long and somewhat complicated account between the parties had to be adjusted. The cause was referred to a special master, who took the evidence and reported his conclusions to the court; exceptions were filed thereto which, being overruled by the court, a'decree was entered in accordance with the finding of the master, that appellant pay to appellee the sum of $1,320. We have carefully examined the evidence, and the exceptions and reasons urged against the decree of the court, and perceive no error, but think that substantial justice has been reached.

It would serve no good purpose to enter into a detailed statement of the various items entering into the final decree, but we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by the court, and therefore the decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Ill. App. 68, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snell-v-de-land-illappct-1889.