Snell Isle Inc. v. Avery

137 So. 10, 103 Fla. 90
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 14, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The writ of error here is to a judgment entered by a referee -duly appointed and acting as provided by statute.

In the final analysis the question presented for determination here is, “Was the evidence sufficient to support the findings and judgment of the referee”?

The evidence is conflicting and it appears the referee resolved the conflicts in favor of the plaintiff. That the findings of the referee were clearly erroneous is not made to appear. We find substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and judgment and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Wi-iitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snell Isle Inc. v. Avery, 137 So. 10, 103 Fla. 90 (Fla. 1931).

137 So. 10 (Snell Isle Inc. v. Avery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.