Snell Isle Inc. v. Avery

137 So. 10, 103 Fla. 90
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 10 (Snell Isle Inc. v. Avery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snell Isle Inc. v. Avery, 137 So. 10, 103 Fla. 90 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The writ of error here is to a judgment entered by a referee -duly appointed and acting as provided by statute.

In the final analysis the question presented for determination here is, “Was the evidence sufficient to support the findings and judgment of the referee”?

The evidence is conflicting and it appears the referee resolved the conflicts in favor of the plaintiff. That the findings of the referee were clearly erroneous is not made to appear. We find substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and judgment and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Wi-iitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 10, 103 Fla. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snell-isle-inc-v-avery-fla-1931.