Sneeden v. . Harris
This text of 12 S.E. 205 (Sneeden v. . Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after stating the facts: The facts stated above appear only from what purports to be the case settled on appeal in a case therein mentioned. There is no transcript of a record proper. It does not appear that a Court was held at the time and place prescribed by law, no summons or pleadings appear; there is no transcript of the record of an action in the Superior Court. Moreover, if a proper transcript appeared, the supposed appeal was taken from an interlocutory order, from which an appeal at once did not lie. The appellant should have assigned error on the record, and appealed from a final judgment.
The appeal must be dismissed. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 S.E. 205, 107 N.C. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneeden-v-harris-nc-1890.