Sneed v. State

891 So. 2d 1213, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 2005 WL 236522
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2005
DocketNo. 4D04-2051
StatusPublished

This text of 891 So. 2d 1213 (Sneed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sneed v. State, 891 So. 2d 1213, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 2005 WL 236522 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In his motion for postconviction relief, appellant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present a voluntary intoxication defense. Because the record does not conclusively refute this allegation, we reverse for an evidentiary hearing on the issue. See Kijewski v. State, 831 So.2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kijewski v. State
831 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 So. 2d 1213, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 2005 WL 236522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneed-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.