Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sneed v. State

Sneed v. State

778 So. 2d 509, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158, 2001 WL 195089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2001
DocketNo. 4D99-667
StatusPublished

This text of 778 So. 2d 509 (Sneed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sneed v. State, 778 So. 2d 509, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158, 2001 WL 195089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced to concurrent equal sentences as both a habitual offender and a prison releasee reoffender. The state concedes that resentencing is required pursuant to Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Grant.

WARNER, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 So. 2d 509, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158, 2001 WL 195089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneed-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.