Sneed v. Smith
This text of 1 Patton & Heath 46 (Sneed v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court is of opinion that, whatever grounds there may be for suspecting that the appellant exacted from the appellee usurious interest upon the various loans in the proceedings mentioned; as the allegations in the bill are denied in the answer and unsustained by proof, the appellee is not entitled to any relief. The court is also of opinion, for a similar reason, that the appellee is not entitled to any relief as to the credit of $350, claimed by him on account of the negotiable note in the bill mentioned; and that the said decree is, therefore, erroneous.
Decree reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Patton & Heath 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneed-v-smith-vactapp-1855.