Sneed v. Moorehead

70 Miss. 690
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 70 Miss. 690 (Sneed v. Moorehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sneed v. Moorehead, 70 Miss. 690 (Mich. 1893).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The declaration does not show liability of the defendants for the injury suffered by the plaintiff-. They were under no obligation to have railing, or other protection, around the “ gallery.” The possibility that some one might fall off, was not sufficient-to suggest that a railing should be put there. The situation was known to the plaintiff, and the necessity for caution had presented itself to her, as shown by her putting the light so as to guide her on her return to her room. Her error, resulting in serious hurt, consisted in going on when she found the light gone. Her misfortune is deplored, but reparation cannot be made by despoiling the defendants, who were under no greater obligation to have railing around galleries than other persons who have galleries, and invite visitors to their houses.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Early v. Lowe
195 S.E. 852 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1938)
Baker v. Butterworth
89 S.E. 849 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1916)
Scholl v. Belcher
127 P. 968 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1912)
Clancy v. Barker
131 F. 161 (Eighth Circuit, 1904)
Clancy v. Barker
98 N.W. 440 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Miss. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneed-v-moorehead-miss-1893.