Sneed v. Cozier

202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2908

This text of 202 A.D.2d 679 (Sneed v. Cozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sneed v. Cozier, 202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent to dismiss Kings County Indictment Number 3689/92.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has demonstrated no clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Molea v. Marasco
475 N.E.2d 109 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sneed-v-cozier-nyappdiv-1994.